Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The plaintiff made application to the defendant insurance company for a policy of health and accident insurance, which was issued to him, the application being attached to and made a part of the policy. Thereafter plaintiff became totally disabled as a result of diabetes. His demand upon the insurer for payment under the policy was refused, and he brought suit on the *642policy. The defendant contended that the policy was void because the plaintiff' had, in answer to a question propounded, in the application, failed to disclose that he had other health and accident insurance, and had failed to…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Logan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Northwestern Life Insurance v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Patterson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- All American Life & Casualty Co. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.