Couch v. National Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Where a copy of the application is not attached to a policy of life-insurance, it does not form a part of the contract of insurance, and consequently the statements therein contained are not to be treated as warranties, and their falsity would not avoid the risk as a matter of contract. Civil Code (1910), § 2471.
2. Although the unattached application could not be admitted for the purpose of showing a breach of the contract, since it forms no part of the contract, still, where the defense is that the policy was fraudulently procured by reason of false and fraudulent representations material…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Southern Life Insurance v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Life Insurance v. PateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- National Life & Accident Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. SneedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Lee v. All States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Ætna Insurance v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.