Legal Opinion

West Union Canal Co. v. Thornley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1924No. 4136PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover contribution for the expense of maintaining an irrigation canal. Plaintiff bases its right to recover upon Laws Utah 1919, c. 67, § 13. That section reads as follows:

“When two or more persons, companies or corporations are associated by agreement or otherwise, in the use of any dam, canal, reservoir, ditch, lateral, flume or other means of conserving or conveying water for the irrigation of land or for other purpose, each of them shall be liable to the other for the reasonable expenses of maintaining, operating and controlling the same, in proportion…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Peterson v. Sevier Valley Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Thomas v. District Court of Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Perry Irrigation Co. v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API