Legal Opinion

Burleson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 23, 1989No. IP88-318-CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This diversity action comes before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The issues raised have been briefed as of August 16,1989, and are ready for resolution. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. The plaintiff cannot recover consequential damages in this good faith dispute, but he can seek pre-judgment interest.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1

Plaintiff Richard Burleson owned a home at 3749 Alsace Drive in Indianapolis, and insured the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
  2. Indiana Insurance v. Plummer Power Mower & Tool Rental, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Rhodes v. County of Darlington, SCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  4. Richland-Lexington Airport District v. Atlas Properties, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994
  5. Rockford Mutual Insurance Co. v. PirtleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API