Legal Opinion

Ilko v. California State Board of Equalization (In Re Ilko)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2011No. 09-60049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We affirm the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the reasons stated in its Memorandum dated October 15, 2009, attached to this Order as the Appendix.

AFFIRMED.

APPENDIX

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: Daniel Ilko, Debtor. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Appellant, v. DANIEL ILKO, Appellee.

BAP No. SC-09-1119-JuRMo Bk. No. 01-07056 Adv. No. 08-90324

MEMORANDUM 1

Argued and Submitted on September 23, 2009 at Pasadena, California

Filed — October 15, 2000

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle FrancisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ulrich v. Walker (In Re Boates)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. In re: Beverlyann LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. In re: Birger Greg BacinoUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. In re: Daniel Bruce Carpenter and Mary Esther CarpenterUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API