Legal Opinion
In re: Daniel Bruce Carpenter and Mary Esther Carpenter
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2015No. MT-14-1499-KlPaJuPublished
1Opinion of the Court
FILED NOV 18 2015 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 6 In re: ) BAP No. MT-14-1499-KlPaJu ) 7 DANIEL BRUCE CARPENTER and ) Bk. No. 2:13-bk-61192-RBK MARY ESTHER CARPENTER, ) 8 ) Debtors. ) 9 _______________________________) ) 10 DANIEL BRUCE CARPENTER; MARY ) ESTHER CARPENTER, ) 11 ) Appellants, ) 12 ) v. ) O P I N I O N 13 ) MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ) 14 AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT ) INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS BUREAU,) 15 ) Appellee. ) 16 _______________________________) 17…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Litton Loan Servicing, LP v. Garvida (In Re Garvida)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Darrel v. Shank, Debtor. Darrel v. Shank v. Washington State Department of Revenue, Excise Tax Division, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- George v. California State Board of Equalization (In Re George)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.