Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bartfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

After being laid off from her position at her husband’s business and while collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant continued to write checks on behalf of the business. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found claimant ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she was not totally unemployed. Claimant was charged with a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Di GiacomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BreitroseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of SheinfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of BerzonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re the Claim of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API