Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 3, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period that she was receiving unemployment insurance benefits following her separation from her former employment as a purchasing clerk. Claimant admitted that during the applicable period, she wrote checks for her husband’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of TenorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of BartfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChiricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of BickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of CiraoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of De RobbioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API