Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Sheinfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 26, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found claimant ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed and charged him with a recoverable overpayment. The record establishes that, among other things, claimant performed the bookkeeping for his wife’s business and wrote the majority of the checks for the business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of BartfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KaganovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of OursAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of BerzonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API