Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Breitrose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 13, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant failed to report that she was rendering services on behalf of a photo processing business that she co-owned with her husband. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because she was not totally unemployed. The Board further charged claimant with a recoverable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BartfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of RotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KazinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of StaskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re the Claim of HockerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API