Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 15, 1992, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

In May 1989 claimant’s wife and her cousins formed a corporation for the purpose of engaging in the business of recharging printer cartridges. Claimant and his wife testified that he had nothing to do with the enterprise until he stopped *928receiving unemployment insurance benefits in early September 1989. Claimant’s wife testified, however, that the business was started with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GonyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Claim of SmaltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BartfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of MizenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of RuqusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API