Willmar Cookie Co. v. Pippin Pecan Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Pippin Pecan Company appeals from the denial of post-trial motions and from a judgment based on special verdict findings that the company sold unmerchantable pecans, unfit for their intended purpose, and that the purchaser gave timely notice of breach and revocation of acceptance. The company also contends it is entitled to a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
This appeal involves 642 cases of shelled, standard grade pecan halves purchased 'by Willmar Cookie Company of Willmar, Minnesota, from Pippin Pecan Company of Albany, Georgia, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Vikse v. FlabySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Johannsen v. Minnesota Valley Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Bergemann v. Mutual Service Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Simitar Entertainment, Inc. v. UAV Corp. (In Re Simitar Entertainment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.