Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided October 13, 1994No. 09-93-126 CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
On Motion for Rehearing the Court withdraws its opinion filed June 30, 1994, and its concurring and dissenting opinion filed August 4, 1994, and this opinion is substituted therefor.
Appeal from a jury verdict adverse to Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company (“3M”). The jury found that 3M had breached expressed warranties and implied warranties. The litigation arose pursuant to 3M’s sale of certain materials, emulsion, and backcoat sauce used to make and produce three-dimensional photographs and photographic prints.
Skeletal Background Facts…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Sharp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
- Cecil v. T.M.E. Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.