Legal Opinion
Johannsen v. Minnesota Valley Ford Tractor Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1981No. 50646, 50647PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Justice.
The defendants, Ford Motor Co. and Minnesota Valley Ford (dealer), appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Harvey Johannsen, the buyer of a defective tractor manufactured by Ford and sold to him by the dealer. After a trial in which the jury found that Johannsen had effectively revoked his acceptance of a Ford Model 9700 tractor (9700), the district court entered judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of the purchase price of the tractor less an offset for use and depreciation. Defendants appeal from the order denying post-trial motions for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Fablok Mills v. Cocker MacH. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Minsel v. El Rancho Mobile Home Center, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Village of Wells v. Layne-Minnesota Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Computerized Radiological Services, Cross-Appellant v. Syntex Corporation and Syntex Analytical Instruments, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.