Legal Opinion
State v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 8, 1987No. 12018PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether incriminating oral statements that the defendant made to the police during a custodial interrogation should have been suppressed by virtue of the right to counsel guaranteed by article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution. In our original decision in this case, we concluded that the statements were inadmissible under the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution. State v. Barrett, 197 Conn. *43950, 495 A.2d 1044 (1985). We declined to consider what state constitutional rights the defendant might have had because he had…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.