Gianetti v. Rutkin
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
This case raises the spectre of “balance billing,” a practice by which the health care provider seeks to recover from the patient the difference between the self-determined value of the provider’s services and the amount provided for in the contract between the provider and the health maintenance organization. Although balance billing generally has not been countenanced,1 in this case the physician had no contractual arrangement with the patient’s health insurer. Because of this distinction, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in favor of the health care provider.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. Northridge Emergency Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Reinke v. Greenwich Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kupersmith v. KupersmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Gianetti v. DunsbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- NEMS, PLLC v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Town of Canton v. Cadle Properties of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Vaccaro v. D'AngeloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.