Legal Opinion

Gemkist Farms, Inc. v. Bolen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1982No. 12992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Gemkist Farms, Inc. leased one of its farms to Bolen for a specified period on an equal crop-share basis. Near the end of the lease period, Gemkist decided not to renew the agreement. When Bolen remained on the property beyond the lease period, Gemkist filed suit to regain possession of the farm, and for an accounting of all sales of crops and livestock raised on the premises. Judgment was awarded to Gemkist after trial to the court. We affirm.

On appeal, Bolen argues the trial court made several errors in the administration of the litigation. Briefly, the alleged errors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Compton v. GilmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Marshall Bros., Inc. v. GeislerIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Nesbitt v. WolfkielIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Earl v. FordiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Idaho Land Developers, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Glengary-Gamlin Protective Ass'n v. BirdIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Seccombe v. WeeksIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. R.T. Nahas Co. v. HuletIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. City of Boise City v. GabicaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API