Legal Opinion
Earl v. Fordice
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1962No. 9029PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action under the provisions of I. C. § 6-202 to recover treble damages for the cutting of timber on his property, claimed to have been done by defendants.
The applicable parts of I.C. § 6-202 reads:
“Any person who cuts down or carries off any wood * * * tree, or timber, or girdles, or otherwise injures any tree or timber on the land of another person, * * * without lawful authority, is liable to the owner of such land, * * * for treble the amount of damages which may be assessed therefor in a civil action, in any court having jurisdiction.”
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Smith v. ShinnIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Fowler v. Crown-Zellerbach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Melton v. AmarIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Menasha Woodenware Co. v. Spokane International Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weitz v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Bumgarner v. BumgarnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mock v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 1992
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Sells v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.