Legal Opinion

City of Boise City v. Gabica

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1984No. 14104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to review a district court decision containing an injunction against certain business activities in a residential zone. The City of Boise brought this action against Vincent and Sylvia Gabica, seeking to enjoin the operation of a rug and carpet cleaning business from their home. The Gabicas answered, in part, that the business constituted a permissible “accessory use” of the residence. The district court declined to enjoin bookkeeping and telephone communications inside the house. The court also refused to interfere with the Gabicas’ practice of parking one or two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chatham v. DonaldsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Christensen v. Idaho Land Developers, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Perron v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
  4. Gemkist Farms, Inc. v. BolenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  2. Crum v. State Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. County of Twin Falls v. HettingaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Town of Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API