Seccombe v. Weeks
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
This dispute between adjoining landowners is over a roadway easement claimed by one of them across the land of the other. Kenneth and Sheren Weeks appeal from the district court’s judgment declaring a road easement across their property in favor of Robert and Ruth Sec-combe. The Weeks (we will use this name as though it were plural) contend the court erred in holding that an easement “in view” existed, having been reserved by conveyances referring to such an easement. The Weeks also contend the district court erred in concluding, alternatively, that an easement exists by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- Owen v. BoydstunIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Harris v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Palmer v. FitzpatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Benninger v. DerifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Capstar Radio Operating Co. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Rodriguez v. Oakley Valley Stone, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- McCray v. RosenkranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.