Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Wolfkiel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1979No. 12510PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

Appellants, Donald and Betty Nesbitt, originally brought this action in district court seeking damages for the respondents’, Albert and Ruth Wolfkiel, alleged willful trespass upon land purportedly belonging to the Nesbitts. The Wolfkiels denied any trespass, and asserted that they are the owners of the land in question and that the Nesbitts are the trespassers. In a memorandum opinion after a trial on the merits, the trial court held that the Wolfkiels acquired title to the disputed property by accretion as well as adverse possession. The Nesbitts then brought this appeal.

T…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Johnson v. HurstIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Swanson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hyde v. LawsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fischer v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Aldape v. AkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Owen v. BoydstunIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Trappett v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Capps v. WoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API