Shouse v. Consolidated Flour Mills Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*109The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
As this is the second appearance of this cause in this court (128 Kan. 174, 277 Pac. 54) it will suffice to say that it was an action to recover on quantum meruit for services performed by plaintiffs as- attorneys in behalf of defendant before the income tax unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
The defense was that plaintiffs’ services were of no value; and in a cross petition it was alleged that plaintiffs made such a meager, unsound and insufficient presentation of the law and facts pertaining to the tax liabilities of defendant and its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tefft v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Babbitt v. BumpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. MedlicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Gillman v. Media, Middletown, Aston & Chester Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- A. T. & S. F. Rld. v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Madison v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- Linscott v. HughbanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Pirott v. HeinenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.