Legal Opinion

Madison v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1983No. 54,638PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

The title to this case is confusing in that the only parties who will be affected by the decision herein are appellant Frank D. Taff, an attorney, and appellee Reginald LaBunker, also an attorney. This is because the sole issue herein involves the amount of attorney fees to which each of the aforementioned parties is entitled.

The facts from which this appeal arose are not in dispute.

Donald V. Madison (claimant) was employed by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (respondent). He sustained an injury while on the job. On March 5,1980, claimant first consulted with Frank D. Taff (Taff)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brinkmeyer v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Southeast Kansas Landowners Ass'n v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Carter v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. In Re the Accusation for Disbarment of PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Shouse v. Consolidated Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State of Iowa v. Craig E. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Hinojosa v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Roosevelt Whitfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. City of Wichita v. B G Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API