Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. 0. Oaswell, Judge. There was a judgment for damages from which the defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, O. J. —

1 Linn creek runs through Halbert’s farm, of 235 acres, as does also defendant’s line of railway. Where these intersect there is a bridge, and under it a passageway, with hard bottom, about eight feet wide and six feet high, on the east bank of the creek. But 40 acres, on which the buildings stand, lie south of the track. Immediately north of it is a pasture, to which the cattle pass by the way under the bridge to and from the barnyard. To enable defendant to construct a second track, Halbert conveyed an additional right of way immediately north of that already occupied, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lockett v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wood v. . HubbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Garland v. AurinTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Horne Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Pugh v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Brown v. HoneyfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. First National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Stovern v. Town of CalmarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API