Legal Opinion

Lockett v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1890No. 2841PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Hood. Tried below before Hon. 0. K. Bell.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellant brought this action in behalf of himself and his minor children to recover damages for injuries claimed to have resulted to himself and children from the act of appellee. He alleged that he lived in a house on land which he had rented situated about fifty feet north of appellee’s railway track; that the land where the.house and railway were was so situated that but for the embankment on which the track was and a ditch formed between the track and his house-by an excavation made by appellee the water would drain off after rains;, but that the embankment erected…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vann v. Bowie Sewerage Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. MittenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Boyd, Guardian v. KimbalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. A. Cohen & Co. v. RittimannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API