Legal Opinion

Stovern v. Town of Calmar

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

The defendant is’ an incorporated town, having a population of a-little in excess of 1,000 people.' About 18 years ago, it installed a sewerage system, consisting of mains and laterals.- In connection with this system, . 4 . a 10-mch tile dram was installed, léadmg from the town to and upon land owned by one Busch, where it emptied into a cement tank; but there was no septic tank or filter beds installed as a part of said system, the city having employed a man who, twice a year, placed chemicals in the tank, for purposes of purification. At a later date, more than five years prior to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McGill v. Pintsch Compressing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Bly v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Shively v. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Vogt v. City of GrinnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Bushnell v. Robeson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Kellerhals v. KallenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Kriener v. Turkey Valley Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API