Stovern v. Town of Calmar
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.
The defendant is’ an incorporated town, having a population of a-little in excess of 1,000 people.' About 18 years ago, it installed a sewerage system, consisting of mains and laterals.- In connection with this system, . 4 . a 10-mch tile dram was installed, léadmg from the town to and upon land owned by one Busch, where it emptied into a cement tank; but there was no septic tank or filter beds installed as a part of said system, the city having employed a man who, twice a year, placed chemicals in the tank, for purposes of purification. At a later date, more than five years prior to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGill v. Pintsch Compressing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Bly v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Shively v. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Vogt v. City of GrinnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Bushnell v. Robeson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Kellerhals v. KallenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Kriener v. Turkey Valley Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.