Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Glass

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1998PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

This case presents an issue of first impression in the Commonwealth: whether Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution proscribes the issuance of anticipatory search warrants. If it does, as appellant argues, then all of the evidence seized when the police searched appellant’s residence should have been suppressed. Because we find that anticipatory search warrants do not violate the Pennsylvania Constitution, we affirm.

Before setting forth the factual and procedural history, we note our standard when reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress. We must…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. GlassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. ChiariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API