Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania v. Labron

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1996No. 95-1691PublishedCited by 555 opinions

1Per curiam

In these two cases, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that the Fourth Amendment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth, requires police to obtain a warrant *939before searching an automobile unless exigent circumstances are present. Because the holdings rest on an incorrect reading of the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement, we grant the petitions for certiorari and reverse.

In Labron, No. 95-1691, police observed respondent La-bron and others engaging in a series of drug transactions on a street in Philadelphia. The police arrested the suspects,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by555 opinions

  1. Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Illinois v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Collins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

550 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API