Legal Opinion

Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of the Town of Seymour

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 20, 2009No. SC 18221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiffs, John A. Fanotto, Jr., and Anna Fanotto, submitted an application for a wetlands permit to the defendant, the inland wetlands commission of the town of Seymour (commission). The commission denied the application, and the plaintiffs appealed to the trial court, which dismissed the appeal. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Appellate Court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court. Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission, 108 Conn. App. 235, 236, 947 A.2d 422 (2008). We granted the commission’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Fanotto v. INLAND WETLANDS COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF SEYMOURSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Red 11, LLC v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. River Sound Development, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. American Institute for Neuro-Integrative development, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API