Legal Opinion

Hofius v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1946No. 30543PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Counsel agree that there is but a single question presented by this appeal. As phrased by appellant: “Does the construction and maintenance of a water main under the surface of a county highway for the purpose of supplying water to private custom ers, constitute an additional burden entitling the owner of the fee in the highway to compensation?” The appellees state the question: “The only question to be decided by this court is as to whether the plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to compensation for the installation by the village of such a line within the limits of the highway.”

Appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. CommrsOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ohio Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hay v. Norwalk Lodge, B.P.O.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. White v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Paul v. Wissalohican Camp Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API