Legal Opinion

Furth v. Snell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1893No. 869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of a stock of drugs and store fixtures converted by the defendants. On April 9,1891, one Isaac Korn was the owner, and in possession of the same, and engaged in business in the city of Seattle as a retail druggist. At said time he was indebted to the appellant in the sum of §500, for *543money previously loaned to him. The appellant also held a note for §250, given by said Korn to one Bories, and another note for §2,700, given by said Isaac Korn to M. Korn, these notes having been transferred by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benham v. HamWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ephraim v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Turner v. Iowa National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Vietor v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Furth v. SnellWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Puget Sound National Bank v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API