Legal Opinion

Furth v. Snell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1896No. 1793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

On April 9, 1891, one Isaac Korn was *661the owner and in possession of a certain stock of drugs, medicines, druggist’s articles and store fixtures in the city of Seattle, and was engaged in business as a druggist. At that time he was indebted to the respondent in the sum of $500 for money previously loaned to him', which indebtedness was evidenced by a promissory note. Respondent was also the owner and holder of two other notes made by said Korn one, for $250 payable to the order of one Bories, and the other for $2,708 payable to the order of M.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chaffin v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Frankland v. CassadayTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thatcher v. GottliebCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Crooker v. Pacific Lounge & Mattress Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wheeler v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hammock v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McGill v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API