Holt v. Holt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEsviN, J.
The answers deny the material allegations of the complaints, plead various statutes of limitation, and assert a want of capacity in plaintiffs to prosecute the suits. In consequence, the establishment of three distinct propositions is indispensable to the causes of action alleged by plaintiffs. These are: (1) That the decedent, A. F. Holt, Sr., was induced to execute the conveyances in controversy by fraud or undue influence of the defendants and their alleged co-conspirator, Clifton Gr. Holt; (2) that the cause of action arising out of this wrong existed in A. F. Holt, Sr., at the time of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Rossi v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- City of Denver v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.