Legal Opinion

Holt v. Holt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1950No. 236PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEsviN, J.

The answers deny the material allegations of the complaints, plead various statutes of limitation, and assert a want of capacity in plaintiffs to prosecute the suits. In consequence, the establishment of three distinct propositions is indispensable to the causes of action alleged by plaintiffs. These are: (1) That the decedent, A. F. Holt, Sr., was induced to execute the conveyances in controversy by fraud or undue influence of the defendants and their alleged co-conspirator, Clifton Gr. Holt; (2) that the cause of action arising out of this wrong existed in A. F. Holt, Sr., at the time of…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rossi v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. City of Denver v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  5. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API