Legal Opinion

Muse v. Morrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1951No. 93PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Winbobne, J.

Appellant challenges, and we hold properly so, the correctness of the decision of the court below as shown in the judgment from which this appeal is taken.

The declared purpose of tbis action is to recover damages for alleged injury to plaintiff allegedly caused by wrongful acts done by one or more of tbe defendants as a part of and in furtherance of an alleged conspiracy between defendants “to drive the plaintiff out of his work, trade and business as a plumber and out of the town of Canton, N. C., and Haywood County.”

“A conspiracy is generally defined to be 'an agreement between…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API