Legal Opinion

Azteca Construction, Inc. v. ADR Consulting, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2004No. C045316PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

This case requires us to resolve a conflict between the rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the provisions of the California Arbitration Act (the Act) (Code Civ. Proc., § 1280 et seq.) 1 pertaining to the disqualification of a proposed neutral arbitrator based on pre-arbitration disclosures that might affect his or her impartiality.

The parties here agreed to private arbitration in accordance with the AAA’s then entitled “Construction Industry Dispute Resolution [Rules and] Procedures” (hereafter AAA Rules). Those rules included a provision which stated that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API