Azteca Construction, Inc. v. ADR Consulting, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This case requires us to resolve a conflict between the rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the provisions of the California Arbitration Act (the Act) (Code Civ. Proc., § 1280 et seq.) 1 pertaining to the disqualification of a proposed neutral arbitrator based on pre-arbitration disclosures that might affect his or her impartiality.
The parties here agreed to private arbitration in accordance with the AAA’s then entitled “Construction Industry Dispute Resolution [Rules and] Procedures” (hereafter AAA Rules). Those rules included a provision which stated that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.