Legal Opinion
Reed v. Mutual Service Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 21, 2003No. B157086PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
Pivate investors petitioned the trial court to vacate an arbitration award after a panel of arbitrators concluded the investors’ claims against their securities brokers were not eligible for arbitration. The trial court denied that petition and granted the brokers’ counterpetition to confirm the award. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
This is an appeal from a judgment granting a motion to confirm an arbitration award. The essential facts are undisputed. Beginning in 1990, appellants Peter and Lonnie Reed made several investments through securities accounts they…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Richey v. Autonation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.