Smith v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of Commissioner Hayne.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
A rehearing was granted in this case, and the same has been reargued, but we adhere to our former decision, and adopt the former opinion of Commissioner Hayne as the opinion of the court.
*324The judgment and order are reversed as to the northwest quarter of section 13, township 2 south, range 13 east, and the cause remanded for a new trial as to said property, and said judgment and order are in all other respects affirmed, the appellant to recover one half of the costs on appeal
Beatty, C. J., and Thornton, J., dissented..
The following is the- opinion of Commissioner Hayne above referred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Taylor v. McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Healy v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by21 opinions
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Locke v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Murdock v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kelley v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.