Legal Opinion

Husheon v. Husheon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1886No. 9832PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

By this action the plaintiff seeks to have a deed executed by him to defendant adjudged to be a mortgage; and the facts of the case, as found by the court below, are substantially as follows:—

On the fifteenth day of July, 1876, plaintiff was the owner of 760 acres of land in Humboldt County, of the value of four thousand dollars. He was indebted to one Margaret Fitzgerald in the sum of about five hundred dollars, for which an action had been commenced against him, and his property attached. He had been a partner with one Comise in the dairying business, and Comise was claiming…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Russell v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Conway's Executors & Devisees v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  4. Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Horn v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Campbell v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Cary Co. v. Whiting HyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API