Legal Opinion
Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 20, 1985No. 81-9-425; CA A29273PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiffs’ claim for damages in this case arises out of an exchange of real property. Laeger, an Oregon real estate broker, asked plaintiffs whether they would exchange their Nevada ranch for property in Oregon owned by Praggastis, Laeger’s disclosed principal. Plaintiffs agreed to the exchange. Praggastis is not a party to this action.
Under the terms of the exchange agreement, Laeger was to convey title to Praggastis’ Clackamas and Mountain Park properties to plaintiffs. The Clackamas property previously had been sold to Pendulum Enterprises on a land sale contract. Plaintiffs were to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Gallagher v. Reconco Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Fitzgerald v. NealOregon Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Consumer's Co-Op of Walworth County v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Rice v. Oriental Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Wieber v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.