Legal Opinion

Ross v. Lawson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1978No. 12767PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge, Retired:

Joseph Lawson, appellee, shot George Ross, appellant, several times with a .22 caliber revolver, and was found guilty by a jury of assault with a dangerous weapon, a felony. 1 At trial, Lawson admitted shooting Ross but claimed to have acted in self-defense. On appeal to this court, we affirmed his conviction. 2

The present civil action was brought by Ross against Lawson for damages resulting from the injury caused by the gunshot wounds. At the start of the trial, Ross asked for a directed verdict on the issue of liability, asserting that Lawson, by reason of his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Palma v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  5. Read v. SaccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. James W. McCord Jr. v. F. Lee BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. District of Columbia v. PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API