Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Irell & Manella

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1982No. Civ. 63270PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff in an action for inducing breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and intentional infliction of emotional distress, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm.

During a period of some 18 years, from 1950 until 1968, plaintiff Jerome B. Rosenthal (Rosenthal), an attorney, and the law firms with which he was associated, acted as legal counsel for entertainer Doris Day, her husband Martin Melcher and their various family corporations.

Followin…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Brody v. MontalbanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API