People v. Bamberg
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, P. J.
Appellant Andrew Bamberg contested a traffic citation for failing to stop at a stop sign. He introduced photographs to support his claim there was no stop sign at the intersection at which he purportedly committed the traffic violation. However, a number of the photographs relied upon by appellant actually depicted a different intersection. As a result of appellant’s statements and actions in the traffic case, a jury convicted him of perjury, preparing false evidence, and concealing or destroying evidence. (Pen. Code, §§ 118, 134, 135.)
This appeal requires us to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. CejaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Shah, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.