Legal Opinion

People v. Hale

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 2012No. A127337PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

—A jury found appellant Dean William Hale guilty of numerous sexual offenses involving three young female victims. Appellant raises a number of related claims on appeal based upon his contention that a 10-year statute of limitations applies to a violation of Penal Code1 section 269 for aggravated sexual assault upon a child. He also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)), that evidence of a prosecution witness’s prior theft conviction was improperly excluded, and that the prosecutor committed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Contreras CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Logan CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. People v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API