People v. Hale
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, P. J.
—A jury found appellant Dean William Hale guilty of numerous sexual offenses involving three young female victims. Appellant raises a number of related claims on appeal based upon his contention that a 10-year statute of limitations applies to a violation of Penal Code1 section 269 for aggravated sexual assault upon a child. He also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)), that evidence of a prosecution witness’s prior theft conviction was improperly excluded, and that the prosecutor committed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Contreras CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Logan CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014