People v. Morrison
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
Penal Code section 134 makes it a felony to prepare false evidence with intent that it be produced “upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law.”1 Here, we conclude that the statute is violated by a probationer who prepares a false urine sample with intent to produce it to his probation officer during court-ordered drug testing. Court-ordered probation drug testing is an “inquiry . . . authorized by law” within the meaning of the statute. (Ibid.)
William Tyndall Morrison appeals from a judgment after conviction by jury of preparing false evidence in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. BambergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. LawsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vera v. O'KEEFEDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
- People v. Shah, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. DillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. ShahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019