Legal Opinion

People v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 2011No. B221598PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COFFEE, J.

Penal Code section 134 makes it a felony to prepare false evidence with intent that it be produced “upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law.”1 Here, we conclude that the statute is violated by a probationer who prepares a false urine sample with intent to produce it to his probation officer during court-ordered drug testing. Court-ordered probation drug testing is an “inquiry . . . authorized by law” within the meaning of the statute. (Ibid.)

William Tyndall Morrison appeals from a judgment after conviction by jury of preparing false evidence in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. BambergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. LawsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vera v. O'KEEFEDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
  2. People v. Shah, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. DillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. People v. ShahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API