Haddock v. Knapp
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying a decree for specific performance of an agreement to exchange real property. The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone.
It is alleged in the complaint that on June 14, 1912, the plaintiff and the defendants entered into a written agreement, whereby the defendants agreed to convey to plaintiff lot 7 of tract 510 in the city of Los Angeles, subject to a mortgage thereon for three thousand dollars, and subject also to a lease which was to be assigned to plaintiff. Plaintiff, on his part, agreed to convey to the defendant I. D. Knapp, lots 14 and 15 of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Morrill v. EversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by21 opinions
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Boro v. RuzichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lamb v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Foley v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Williams v. RushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.