Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders refusing new trials. F. J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. E. Foulds, William F. Herrin, and Peter F. Dunne, for Appellant. Charles S. Wheeler, J. W. Dorsey, and J. F. Bowie, for Respondents Ellen Dore et al.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In each of these actions, the defendant has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial. The cases depend mainly upon the same facts. They were tried together upon stipulation that the evidence taken should be considered in both cases so far as applicable.
The plaintiffs, respectively, sue to enforce an agreement for the sale of real estate, made by all of the plaintiffs, as vendors, and by the defendant as vendee. The agreement and the circumstances under which it was made are peculiar. Two actions for the condemnation of said lands and other lands…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Underhill v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.