Legal Opinion

Notten v. Mensing

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1937No. Civ. 10511PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

After this action was commenced the defendants appeared and demurred to the plaintiffs’ complaint. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. From the judgment based on that order the plaintiffs appealed and the decision on appeal was filed April 30, 1935. (Notten v. Mensing, 3 Cal. (2d) 469 [45 Pac. (2d) 198].) After the remittitur was sent down the defendants answered. They denied all of the material allegations contained in the complaint of the plaintiffs. Thereafter a trial was had and later the trial court made findings in favor of the defendants. From the judgment entered on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wallace v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Menke v. DuweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Rolls v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Crail v. BlakelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sonnicksen v. SonnicksenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Wilk v. VencillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API