Legal Opinion

Estate of Arms

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1921No. L. A. No. 6740PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of partial distribution of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James C. Rives, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Lucy R. Arms, widow of the decedent, appeals from a decree of partial distribution, embracing certain land held by decedent at his death.

The respondents are residuary legatees under the last will of the decedent, Harrison Arms. Arms died possessed of a large estate amounting to several hundred thousand dollars’ worth of property, situated in Illinois, where he then resided, and of certain lots on which was a dwelling-house, in Los Angeles County, California. The real property in California was of the value of about twenty thousand dollars. The respondents filed a petition for the distribution…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Estate of LefrancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API