Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Sigler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1994No. C5-93-1886PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

On August 16, 1993, the Director of Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility petitioned this court for disciplinary action against John B. Sigler. Sigler did not respond to the petition, and on October 4,1993, we ordered the allegations deemed admitted pursuant to Rule 13(b), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and set a hearing to determine the appropriate discipline. The Director recommends indefinite suspension with a minimum of one year. We conclude that a minimum of two years’ suspension best fits the facts and circumstances of this ease.

Pursuant to our October 4, 1993…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API