Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Beman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1990No. C2-89-1520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed with this court a petition seeking public discipline of the Respondent. In the petition the Director alleged that Respondent had been placed on restricted status pursuant to Rule 3, Minnesota Rules of Continuing Legal Education which limits him to representing himself and close relatives because of failure to complete required continuing legal education requirements. The Director alleges that notwithstanding being placed on such status, the Respondent continued to actively practice law including representing persons…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SiglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against JaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against LallierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HolmaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API