In Re Disciplinary Action Against Beman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed with this court a petition seeking public discipline of the Respondent. In the petition the Director alleged that Respondent had been placed on restricted status pursuant to Rule 3, Minnesota Rules of Continuing Legal Education which limits him to representing himself and close relatives because of failure to complete required continuing legal education requirements. The Director alleges that notwithstanding being placed on such status, the Respondent continued to actively practice law including representing persons…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SiglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In re Disciplinary Action Against JaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against LallierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HolmaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.